Getting Started | Journals and Law Reviews | Databases | Primary Authorities | Secondary Authorities | Federal Agencies, Associations, and NGOs | Brief Bibliography
Some quick jumping off points: |
As in all projects, unless you are already knowledgeable about the topic area, it is best to start with introductory resources and then to consult more focused works; moving from secondary to primary resources.
Articles, books and government documents can provide you with an overview of your topic and help you think of search terms that you might not have thought of otherwise. They will also cite primary authorities such as statutes and case law. You can then use the primary sources cited in the secondary sources as a jumping off point to find other primary sources.
Please note that many of the electronic resources identifed below are available to members of the University of Maryland School of Law community from anywhere on campus and from home via the UMB network. Members of the public from outside the Law School are invited to use these resources for free on campus only [access policies]. Additionally, a number of the Internet resources below are freely available and can be followed directly from this website.
The two main indexes to law journals available in the Law Library are LegalTrac and Index to Legal Periodicals & Books. These indexes include references to many journals not included in the more familiar Westlaw or Lexis databases and in some cases provide access to the full text electronically. Each of these two online indexes has a parallel print version: the Current Law Index (K33 .C87), and the Index to Legal Periodicals (K9 .N32) are shelved near the print journals on level 1. The Index to Legal Periodicals is particularly helpful if you need to find articles published prior to 1980.
Additionally, many journals not subscribed to directly in a print version are available in electronic form via one of the library's databases. The list below of subscription databases should help you get started in locating these resources.
Most print journals are shelved on level 1 of the library, in alphabetical order by journal title. Many of these titles also have an electronic version. To find out if the library has a particular journal title in electronic format, please check the library's collection of electronic journals or ask a librarian for help.
Below are a few titles that might help you to get started.
The Thurgood Marshall Law Library offers access to a number of different databases that cover the topic of election law and related political science and public policy topics. For members of the law school community these databases are available anywhere on campus and from off-site with your UMBID. Researchers from outside the law school are welcome to use these tools in the library. These databases are valuable tools for conducting research during the introductory stage of a project as well as for locating more specialized resources.
"Primary authorities are authorized statements of the law by governmental institutions. Such documents include the written opinions of courts (case law); constitutions; legislation; rules of court and the rules, regulations and opinions of administrative agencies." An Introduction to Legal Research. Jacobstein, Merskey and Dunn (1998).

NOTE: for both more comprehensive and more precise case law searches be sure to check either Lexis or Westlaw above.
Lexis Tip: If you find one good case on Lexis, you may be able to find others by identifying the headnote that best describes the issue of interest to you, then clicking "More Like This Headnote," or by Shepardizing the case to find other cases that have cited it for the issue represented by the headnote.
Westlaw Tip: If you find one good case on Westlaw, you may be able to find others by identifying the headnote(s) that best describes the issue of interest to you, then clicking "Most Cited Cases" for that headnote. You could also try clicking "KeyCite Notes" to fine other cases that have cited your case for the issue represented by that headnote.
"Secondary authority is anything other than primary authority [law] that a court could use as a basis for decision, should the matter you are researching come before a court...Secondary authority includes commentary sources...treatises, periodicals, dictionaries, and encyclopedias of various sorts." The Process of Legal Research: Successful Strategies. Kunz, Schmedemann, et al. (1992).
Legal encyclopedias are a secondary source for understanding the law. They are an excellent resource for starting research particularly in an unfamiliar area of the law. Usually arranged alphabetically by subject the brief articles will contain citations to case law and statutes relevant to the topic.
Two other, more general, legal encyclopedias are:
Like legal encyclopedias commentaries are a secondary source that can provide valuable background when approaching a topic area that may be new to the researcher. There are a number of commentary types available although almost all share some basic features - detailed analysis of the issues represented by a particular case or series of cases; annotations to case law and relevant statutes; and some type of internal finding aid or index. The American Law Reports is one of the most frequently consulted type of commentary.
Additional sources of secondary material: hornbooks, nutshells, treatises, and restatements can be located by using the library's catalog.
Government agencies, think-tanks, scholarly Internet sites, non-profit organizations
and blogs may all be sources of valuable background information. When using
any of these sites it is important to keep in mind the orientation or affiliation
of the resource creator.
The following is a partial list of recent Election Law related materials available in the Thurgood Marshall Law Library. For additional sources on this topic, please check the library's Catalog.
Alvarez, R. Michael.
Point, click and vote: the future of Internet voting.
Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2004.
JK1985.A58 2004
Asking the right questions about electronic voting / Richard Celeste,
Dick Thornburgh, and Herbert Lin, editors ; Committee on a Framework for Understanding
Electronic Voting, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Division on
Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Research Council. Washington, D.C.
: National Academies Press, 2006.
JK1985 .A85 2006
Coolidge, David Orgon
A legal fantasy: Marylanders for Tolerance Now! v. Maryland
State Administrative Board of Election Laws and American Citizens for Tolerance
Now! v. Federal Election Commission.
From: The Journal of Law and Religion Wntr 1995, v11, n1, p109-141.
PERIODICAL STACKS
Fisher, Erica.
What do local election officials think about election reform?[survey]
/ Eric A. Fisher, Kevin J. Coleman.
Washington, DC: Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service, 2005.
JK1976 .F35 2005
Fortier, John C. (Editor)
After the People Vote: A Guide to the Electoral College.
Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 2004.
JK529.A68 2004
Gerken, Heather K.
A third way for the Voting Rights Act: section 5 and the opt-in approach.
From: 106 Columbia Law Review 708 (2006).
Kuhn, David Paul.
The Neglected Voter: White Men and the Democratic Dilemma
New York: Palgrave McMillian, 2007.
JK1965.K84 2007
Manza, Jeff.
Locked out : felon disenfranchisement and American democracy / Jeff Manza
and Christopher Uggen.
Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2006.
JK1846 .M26 2006
Maryland. Circuit Court (Anne Arundel County).
Linda Schade, et al, plaintiffs v. Maryland State Board of Elections, Linda
H. Lamone (as Administrator of Maryland's State Board of Elections), defendants
- complaint / Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County Maryland and judge Joseph
P. Manck.
Annapolis, Md. : Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County Maryland, 2004.
KFM1620 .A254 2004
Mayer, William G.
The Swing Voter in American Politics.
Washington,
DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2008.
JK1967.SD95 2008
Purged: how a patchwork of flawed and Inconsistent voting systems could
deprive millions of Americans the right to vote.
New York: ACLU, 2004.
KF4893.A3 P70
Electronic Access:http://www.aclu.org/VotingRights
Robinson, Andrew.
The Voting Rights Cases of 1937: The Adoption of Voting Machine Technology
in Baltimore City
[University of Maryland School of Law, Thurgood Marshall Law Library], 2007.
E-Scholarship
Repository
Saltman, Roy G.
The history and politics of voting technology : in quest of integrity and
public confidence / Roy G. Saltman.
New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
JK1965 .S25 2006
Streb, Matthew J. (Ed.)
Law and election politics: the rules of the game.
Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2005.
KF4886.L39 2005
United States Government Accountability Office.
Elderly Voters: Some Improvements in Voting Accessibility from 2000 to 2004,
but Gaps in Policy and Implementation Remain. Testimony Before the Special Committee
on Aging, U.S. Senate.
Government Accountability Office. Washington, D.C. ,2008.
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08442t.pdf
United States Government Accountability Office.
Elections : the nation's evolving election system as reflected in the November
2004 general election : report to congressional committees / United tes
Government Accountability Office. Washington, D.C., [2006].
JK1985 .E42 2006
Valelly, Richard M.
The Voting Rights Act : securing the ballot / Richard M. Valelly, editor.
Washington, D.C. : CQ Press, c2006.
JK1924 .V68 2006
Walters, Ronald W.
Freedom is not enough : Black voters, Black candidates, and American presidential
politics / Ronald W. Walters.
Lanham, Md. : Rowan & Littlefield Publishers : Distributed by National Book
Network, c2005.
JK1924 .W343 2005
William, Beth.
Exploring
Initiative and Referendum Law: Selected State Research Guides.
Legal Reference Services Quarterly. v. 26, no. 3/4 (2006)